The Supreme Court of Zimbabwe has ruled in favor of Nestlé Zimbabwe in a long-standing legal dispute with the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (Zimra) over tax assessments totaling US$15.9 million. The dispute, which began in 2009, centered on ZIMRA’s attempts to issue replacement tax assessments for the years 2009 to 2013, despite Nestlé having already paid the original assessments.
Nestlé argued that the replacement assessments were unnecessary and lacked legal basis, while ZIMRA insisted on having the assessments validated. The High Court initially blocked ZIMRA from issuing the replacement assessments, and the Supreme Court has now upheld this decision.
The Supreme Court’s ruling emphasizes the principle of finality in litigation, stating that ZIMRA’s attempts to issue replacement assessments “fly in the face of the principle of finality to litigation, which is a pillar of the rule of law.” The court also noted that the assessments were null and void, rendering ZIMRA’s appeal without merit.
This dispute began in 2016 when ZIMRA issued amended tax assessments to Nestlé, claiming anomalies in the company’s self-assessment declarations. Nestlé disputed these claims, leading to a series of court battles. In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that the revised assessments issued by ZIMRA were invalid due to non-compliance with the Income Tax Act.
ALSO READ: Zimbabwean National Convicted of Laundering Over $1.2 Million
Despite this ruling, ZIMRA attempted to issue new assessments in January 2022, which Nestlé challenged in court. The High Court granted Nestlé declaratory relief, and ZIMRA appealed to the Supreme Court, leading to the latest ruling.
The Supreme Court’s decision is a significant victory for Nestlé, affirming the company’s position that the replacement assessments lacked legal basis. The ruling also underscores the importance of finality in litigation and the need for tax authorities to adhere to the rule of law.
In essence, the Supreme Court has put an end to ZIMRA’s attempts to issue replacement tax assessments, affirming Nestlé Zimbabwe position and upholding the principle of finality in litigation. This ruling provides clarity and certainty for taxpayers and ensures that tax authorities operate within the bounds of the law
